GitHub Copilot
Current- Annual cost
- $100
- Seats assigned
- $100/yr
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Continue.Dev is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for GitHub Copilot.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how GitHub Copilot compares to 10 alternative apps you can switch to.
KiroWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Kiro trades Copilot's convenience for data sovereignty — same AI power, but your source code never leaves your infrastructure.
OpencodeWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Eliminate per-seat fees and data leakage risks entirely, but trade Copilot's polish for DIY infrastructure overhead.
VoidWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Void cuts subscription costs to zero and keeps code on-premises, but dumps the LLM infrastructure burden onto your team.
CursorWorth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$240/yr
Claude Co...Worth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--Claude Code sacrifices seamless IDE integration for autonomous terminal execution—pay for what you use, only if your team tolerates context switching.
CodexNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Codex is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
Firebase ...Not RecommendedSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$300/yrContinue.Dev and Kiro selected for comparison.
$120
Individual ($10/month)
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $1,200 estimated migration cost.
--
After $4,500 estimated migration cost.
--
78/100
Engineering teams prioritizing code privacy and model flexibility adopt Continue fastest since it runs locally or connects to private LLMs. However, teams requiring centralized billing, zero-configuration deployment, and native GitHub security scanning will find the DIY setup burdensome. Security-conscious organizations in regulated industries benefit most from the open-source transparency.
68/100
Kiro suits enterprise engineering teams in regulated sectors needing air-gapped AI assistance. Financial services and healthcare adopt it for compliance, but startups find its configuration overhead unnecessary compared to Copilot's plug-and-play setup. The self-hosting requirement demands DevOps resources that smaller teams lack.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Continue.Dev is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 2 weeks and $1,200 one-time cost.
low
Kiro is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $4,500 one-time cost.
4.5/5.0
8750 reviews
--
1200 reviews
--
340 reviews
No migration needed
2 weeks
High
Continue.Dev is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 2 weeks and $1,200 one-time cost.
4 weeks
High
Kiro is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $4,500 one-time cost.
--
$1,200
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$4,500
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
100%
Supports 45 native integrations.
89%
Supports 40 native integrations.
40%
Supports 18 native integrations.
100%
0%
0%
You already standardize on this app.
You prioritize code privacy and want the flexibility to switch between local open-source models and commercial APIs.
Data residency and code privacy are non-negotiable compliance requirements
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You rely on GitHub-native security scanning and automatic pull request summaries without custom integration work.
Your workflows depend on GitHub's native pull request summaries and broad IDE support
